|
Supercharge and Manage Your Portfolio in Five Minutes a Day
By Braden Glett, glett@yahoo.com
Copyright © 1995 by Braden Glett
Noncommercial reproduction and use allowed as long as authorship is
noted.
New! Braden Glett's new book builds on some of the original ideas
from this "Five Minute Investing" material, and has a whole lot more.
The book is scheduled for publication in September 2002. You can find
out more at Amazon:
Stock Market Stratagem: Loss Control and Portfolio Management .
Click for the
printer-friendly version
of this chapter.
Chapter 4: Stock Picking
Stock investing is something that has been made out to be far more
complicated than it needs to be. There are far more complicated
approaches to stock-picking than those presented in this chapter, but
the guidelines presented here will result in 95% of the results of
those approaches with only 5% of the time, effort, and
confusion. Since the name of this book is Five Minute Investing, I
have chosen to build these guidelines in such a way as to minimize
your time commitment while helping you avoid the investor mistakes
outlined in previous sections.
- 1) Look for positive price momentum
-
Most investors search diligently for companies where some good
situation is developing - and rightfully so. They do this by asking
brokers, looking for stories in the press, etc., but few stop to
realize that the stock market itself gives them a list of such
companies every day in the form of the new 52-week highs list. Most
likely it's because they have believed some of the misconceptions
dealt with in Chapter 1 and wrongly felt that if something appeared on
the new-highs list, it's too late to buy. Actually, nothing could be
further from the truth.
The simplest, best way to assemble a list of potential high performers
is to refer to this new 52-week highs list included in just about
every financial newpaper. I highly advocate that investors begin their
stock picking expeditions by referring to this list. Remember that
companies on the new-highs list do not get there because a
certain financial reporter likes them, or because the government
thinks they are good for society, or because a brokerage firm will get
a hefty commission if the stock appears there. Stock market investors
themselves who are knowledgeable about the company in question put
them on the list by voting with their own hard-earned dollars, bidding
the price up to new highs. Stocks do not appear on it unless there is
something in fact really good and tangible happening
with the company's prospects. Furthermore, few good situations develop
in one day; they develop over many weeks, months, or years. So, many
of the uptrends evidenced in the new highs list will most probably
continue on for some time. Not all will, but as long as our strategy
allows for weeding out those stocks that do not continue increasing in
price we will probably be all right. This part will be dealt with
later in the book.
Ask yourself the following two questions:
- How often does a company make a new price high when something
good isn't happening?
- How often does a company where something really good is happening
fail to trade close to or at a new high price?
I believe the answer to both of these questions is seldom. All
trends eventually come to an end and stocks can go from making new
highs to making new lows with breathtaking rapidity. But even in that
extreme case, if you utilize the Reverse Scale Strategy introduced in
Chapter 7, you may be able to react before major damage is done to
your portfolio value. If something very good or bad starts to happen
to a company's earnings trend, it will most likely start to show up in
the trend of the stock long before you will read about it in the press
- or hear about it from your broker. But the stocks that show positive
momentum by appearing on the new-highs list have a excellent chance of
continuing their trends. In a nutshell, the new-highs list technique
isn't infallible, but then neither is the stock-picking advice of your
broker.
I believe you are almost always better off picking your own investment
ideas because you will know why you picked them. Also, you will be
more aware of what is happening in the market since you won't have
delegated responsibility for your money to someone else - someone who
most likely has hundreds of individual accounts to oversee. It is your
money and the more personal attention you can give to it, the better
off you will be. Certainly, unless you are very wealthy, you can give
more attention to your portfolio than can a broker or
advisor. However, it may be best to let your advisor manage the
majority of your money, while you try the strategies in this book with
your true risk capital.
Finally, if you do not believe that the stocks on the new-highs list
tend to outperform others, pick a group of ten stocks from the new
highs list and a group from the new-lows list. Track how each group
performs over the next few months. Unless you happened to pick a very
unusual time period, you will see that the new-highs as a group
seriously outpace the new-lows group. If you are into instant
gratification, you could also go to the library and pick a random list
from a year or two ago and see how they have done since then. If you
do, be sure you account for stock splits that may have occurred in the
last year, since there may well be some where that has happened -
especially among the stocks which appeared on the new-highs list. I
highly encourage anyone to perform this simple and unambiguous
experiment.
Your performance can be further enhanced by not only choosing stocks
making new 52-week highs, but better yet pick stocks that are at
all time new highs in price. This will take a little more work
for you because you will not find such a list in the newspaper. The
best way to distinguish between issues making new 52-week and those
making new all time highs is by looking at a long-term chart
book. Obviously, any stock making a new all-time high will also be on
the new 52-week high list, so begin your search with the 52-week high
list.
- 2) Diversify between industry groups
-
Because stocks within an industry tend to move more or less in
lockstep, make an attempt to diversify your portfolio between at least
three industry groups. This will help to reduce some of the risk in
your portfolio and having your money spread over several industries
will help even out more of the ups and downs in your account value
than if you had everything in one industry. Whether you are investing
in stocks, fine art, certificates of deposit, bonds, or whatever, the
first rule of investing is: Diversify.
- 3) Beware of stodgy stocks
-
When selecting stocks, beware of picking those stocks that move very
little whether the market is good or bad. These are generally referred
to as "defensive" stocks because they are held by those
wanting to defend themselves against the possibility of a bear
market. These conservative picks tend to underperform the market over
the long run, making them a poor substitute for issues with real
growth potential. Especially during market downturns, defensive
issues hold up well, giving the illusion that there are good things
happening to their underlying businesses. In reality, they hold up
well mostly because investors flock to them for safety. When the
market turns better, these types of companies tend to simply sit still
while the rest of the market charges ahead.
So, it is best to avoid defensive stocks lest you get left behind when
a bull market appears. Issues considered to be defensive include
utility companies, gold stocks, food companies, oils, real estate
investment trusts, and closed-end mutual funds. Closed-end mutual
funds are mutual funds which have a fixed number of shares outstanding
and trade just like a stock on an exchange. While they can sometimes
post large increases in price, for the most part they sputter along
and do not often have the potential for large increases in price.
While there have been times when each of these groups has done very
well, for the most part they are a waste of time for those who are
willing to take a little more risk in order to make a lot more
money. So it is best to exclude defensive stocks, at least from the
aggressive portion of your portfolio.
- 4) Weed out takeover situations
-
I would generally recommend that you look over recent news items
around a company before you make a final decision to buy its
stock. The reason I say this is that some of the stocks on the
new-highs list are stocks of companies which are involved in real or
rumored merger or buyout situations. They are generally a small
minority of the stocks on the new-highs list, but be aware that this
possibility exists. Takeovers and buyouts are unnatural, all-at-once
events which are highly speculative and thus do not lend themselves to
prudent investing. Once a firm is known to be a potential takeover
target the price is dominated not by the company's market position or
products, but rather by the development of the buyout offer. Also,
most of the potential for further price advances is gone once the
initial "pop" from the buyout has occurred.
For purposes of this book, try to avoid buying stocks which have
become known to be the target of a buyout. Buyouts, when they occur,
are big news and are generally well-known. The easiest way I have
found to spot companies where a takeover has occurred is by looking at
the price chart. Takeovers are almost always evidenced by a one-day
increase in the price of the target company's stock of between 20% and
100%. If you see that type of pattern, dig deeper. There is an
excellent chance that this company is in a buyout situation and should
therefore be avoided.
- 5) Check out the Chart
-
Before you buy a stock, take a look at its price chart for the past
year or two. This will give you a snapshot of the stock's personality
from a volatility standpoint. I like to avoid stocks which have high
week-to-week volatility and instead prefer ones which have a tendency
for a cleaner trend. If a stock has a very volatile price pattern,
then it generally means the company has no clear advantage in the
marketplace for its product, services, etc., versus the
competition. Since there are many companies out there which do have a
clear, sustainable advantage in their particular market, I generally
opt to purchase these instead. As an extreme example, following is a
chart of a stock which has shown a very volatile price pattern in the
past year:
I would probably not buy HEI Inc. at this point due to its highly
erratic price pattern with no clear, discernable trend. The stock is
also a long way from hitting a new all-time high, although it's not
too far from making a 52-week high. Because of its poor trend in
combination with the degree of up and down fluctuation in its price, I
would definitely avoid this issue at this time.
As an example of a stock which shows an excellent trend pattern and
low volatility, study this chart of Amgen, Inc. As you can see, the
stock is making a new all-time high combined and is moving more
steadily upward than many other stocks. I would tend to favor a stock
with this type of price chart.
As a rule of thumb, the lower-priced a stock is, the more tendency it
has to be volatile in its trend pattern. This is a good reason to
avoid low-priced stocks and is one of the main reasons I insist on
buying stocks that are above $15 per share.
In addition to volatility, the chart can also give you a clue to other
important facts about the stock, such as if it's in the midst of a
takeover situation (characterized by a large one-day move and a
relatively stable price pattern thereafter), or whether it's a new
issue. New issues sometimes appear on the 52-week highs list not
because they are particularly strong stocks, but simply because they
do not have much trading history behind them. It is best to know about
these things and I can think of no faster way of finding out than by
looking at the stock's chart.
There are several ways to obtain a chart of a company's recent price
history. By far the best and cheapest way these days is by computer,
but there are many published chart services as well. Mansfield Charts
and Daily Graphs are good choices. Standard and Poor's also publishes
a compact book of stock charts which give two years' price history on
many stocks.
Keep in mind that no matter how you get your chart information, you
only need it when intitially selecting a stock for purchase with Five
Minute Investing. As you will see later in the book, you do not need
to lug a computer or chart book around with you in order to manage
your portfolio. Charts are only useful for getting a quick feel for
the stock's trend, volatility, and as a tipoff for weeding out
takeovers and new issues. In Five Minute Investing, they are not
necessary for day-to-day management of your portfolio.
- 6) Other Criteria
-
Other than what's already been mentioned, are there other criteria
which are simple but can help you narrow your stock picks down to a
more succinct list? Yes, and I will try to give a brief overview of
them here. You can then choose how many of these criteria you would
like to use. No matter how few you choose to use, as long as you apply
the first four sections of this chapter you will not go too far
wrong. These items should be considered "finesse points"
that can be used to narrow your choices down to a select few.
- Earnings Growth.
One way to further narrow your list of potential stocks is to focus on
those that are reporting high rates of earnings growth. Do not think
that because a company is presently generating rapid earnings growth
that it cannot continue to do so well into the future. It often takes
years or even decades for competition to nullify such a company's
competitive edge in the products or services it provides, and it is
this competitive edge that allows the rapid growth in sales and
earnings. So, pay close attention to the earnings trend of your
potential stock selections. Where can you get this information? It can
be gotten from any number of publications including Standard and
Poor's and also the Value Line Investment Survey. So far, though, the
easiest place to find summary information on earnings growth is
Investor's Business Daily. IBD has earnings per share rankings for
every stock in the market, every day. For this reason, it is superior
to the other sources of information because all the information can be
found in one place, and in a similar format so that each company's
earnings growth number can be directly compared to every other
company. IBD categorizes earnings growth on a percentile basis, called
the Earnings Per Share ranking. This number ranges between 1 and 99,
with 99 being the most positive. All else being equal, try to pick
issues which have the highest earnings growth, because these are the
companies which have a demonstrated edge in their particular
market.
- Market Capitalization.
Market capitalization is another thing you will want to pay attention
to. Market capitalization is simply the total market value of all the
company's outstanding shares, or total shares multiplied by the price
per share of the company's stock. I generally like to avoid the very
biggest capitalization stocks, say those with capitalizations over $5
billion (in 1995 dollars) or so. This number will change over time,
since the definition of a "big" company is constantly
increasing.
Why take market capitalization into account when picking stocks? The
larger the base of earnings a company is working from, the less likely
they are to be able to grow earnings at a sustainable clip of 30% or
more - and the less likely we are to be rewarded with a windfall
profit. So, try to stick with the smaller-company stocks appearing on
the new-highs list.
- Buy the Price Performers.
Try to choose stocks that have performed well versus other stocks in
the market, from a price standpoint. Simply put, choose the stocks
that have run up most in value. This approach goes directly against
human nature, but by adding this to your list of criteria you will
greatly increase your chances of finding a phenomenal winner. You can
determine how well a stock is doing by looking at it's current price
versus its 52-week low (not high). The higher it is in percentage
terms versus its low point, the better. Or, an easier way is to use
Investor's Business Daily because it provides Relative Strength
rankings on every stock, every day. If you are using Investor's
Business Daily, also try to choose stocks with a relative strength
ranking that is high. Like the EPS ranking mentioned earlier, this
runs from 1 to 99, with 99 being the most favorable and meaning that
the stock is moving upward in price better than 99% of the stocks in
the market. I like to focus on stocks exhibiting a relative strength
ranking of 90 or better. If you do not have a subscription to IBD,
make sure you at least pick up a newstand issue whenever you are
picking new stocks to invest in, as by now you can see how much time
and effort it can save you in gathering information. I consider this
publication to be well worth the price of an annual subscription.
- Share Price.
Finally, try to limit your purchases to stocks sporting a share price
at or above $15/share. By so doing you will enhance your chances of
investing in stocks with good trending potential. Low-price stocks
tend to have very choppy trading patterns and are much more subject to
false trend reversals. I actually prefer to invest in stocks priced
in the $30 to $50 price range, as I find they are often
well-established enough to have a high success rate, but if they are
smaller capitalization issues they also are small enough to have nice
growth potential.
Short-term timing
Many investors let short-term timing considerations overwhelm their
choice of which stocks to buy. I believe this is an error, and also
greatly complicates their stock-picking criteria. People become so
confused by what is happening with short-term oscillators, moving
averages, chart formations, and other mumbo-jumbo that these things
begin to dominate all other considerations. In this book I want to
totally de-emphasize short-term timing and focus on the big picture:
Long-term results.
The simple reason for my philosophy is, I would rather buy a stock
that is overextended and may have a relatively small short-term
pullback in price but on its way to a 1,000% gain than one that is not
at all extended but on its way to only a 50% gain. In fact, on
weekends I often look at the largest percentage price gainers for the
week and I strongly consider those stocks for purchase. I am not
afraid to buy a stock just because it is moving decisively upward. I
believe that if you use the Reverse Scale Strategy as developed later
in this book, you will accumulate your positions gradually enough that
you will not need to worry about whether a stock is overextended,
underextended, or other short-term timing concepts. Therefore, you can
keep your stock-picking techniques as simple as what is presented in
this chapter.
Fundamental Analysis
You may have noticed that there is nothing in this chapter regarding
how to perform fundamental analysis of industries, companies within
that industry, financial analysis of earnings statements and balance
sheets, etc. Perhaps you expected any book on stock picking to include
these topics, but Five Minute Investing does not. The simple reason
for this is that if the market is saying that a certain company's
earnings are expected to grow (evidenced by an accelerating upward
stock trend), why should we find reason to dispute what the market is
saying? As long as we have a loss-cutting mechanism in place, we do
not need to use fundamental analysis to validate what the market
already has told us about the future earnings of the company. The
opinion of the aggregate marketplace has far more credibility in my
eyes than does the opinion of any fundamental analyst, no matter how
good. So I will always go with the opinion of the market, as opposed
to anyone else's opinion, including my own. To me, anyone who tells me
that a stock which is moving up shouldn't be moving up, has by
definition missed something in his analysis.
To make my point on the futility of fundamental analysis for the
average investor, think of how you would determine if the grass in
your lawn was growing quickly. Wouldn't you just measure the grass
today, wait a few days, then measure it again and subtract? If you did
this and discovered that the grass was growing quickly, would you then
go out and conduct a survey of the temperature, rainfall and hours of
sunlight per day to validate that the conditions for growing grass are
indeed good? Of course not! You would rightly conclude that the
conditions for grass growth are good based soley on the fact that the
grass is growing. Even if you did cook up some formula to predict
grass growth based on environmental conditions, would you trust your
formula more than your direct measurement of the grass's actual
growth? If your formula said that grass shouldn't be growing and yet
it was growing, would you stop mowing your lawn? Again, to do so would
be preposterous. You would have to conclude that something is wrong
with your formula.
Unfortunately, common sense of this sort does not get applied in the
stock market by many people. Even though we can directly measure
through a stock's price trend what the company's growth prospects must
be, there is always someone there to try to make us lose sight of that
simple fact by pointing to his "analysis." You can be sure
that for every fantasticly bullish trend, there is some analyst
somewhere saying why it shouldn't be happening all along the way.The
best you can do is to not listen to such opinions, and, again, go back
to the market as your one source of advice.
A final word: Buy Quality
Whether you are investing in stocks, art, coins, or real estate, it is
my opinion that it is always best to buy the highest quality you can
possibly afford. Any review of the return on rare coins or
masterpieces of fine art will quickly reveal that the best returns on
investment have been enjoyed by those who bought the rarest and
highest-priced items. The same principle is true in stock
investing. Do not be afraid to pay a high price relative to earnings,
book value, or sales. In fact, I would ignore such items. I recommend
that you buy the stocks which are moving up persistently in price, and
don't concern yourself that these stocks tend to cost a little bit
more than some more boring issues. History shows that the premium paid
for high-quality items of any kind is generally worth the extra
money.
When picking stocks for investment, apply these criteria:
- Restrict your stock-picking to stocks making new 52-week highs.
- Diversify between at least three different industry groups.
- Weed out defensive stocks and those involved in buyout situations.
- Don't be afraid to pay up for quality.
Five Minute Investing
Introduction
Chapter 1: Replacing Our Stock Market Myths
Chapter 2: Things to Avoid
Chapter 3: Know Yourself
Chapter 4: Stock Picking
Chapter 5: How to Evaluate a Trading Strategy
Chapter 6: The World's Worst Trading Strategy
Chapter 7: The Reverse Scale Strategy
Chapter 8: Margin Power
Chapter 9: Implementing the Reverse Scale Strategy
Chapter 10: Getting Started
This page's URL is http://invest-faq.com/fiveminute/chapter4.html
Five Minute Investing is Copyright © 1995 by Braden Glett,
glett@yahoo.com
Converted to HTML by
Christopher Lott.
Please read the terms of use and
disclaimer statements.
|